For applications like this several runs should be done to get a good 'mark'. The text drawing (quartz) bug is still present if you run it a couple of times the characters are mapped and the test result is about 4x larger than a first time run. Hi, new poster here and I decided to get straight to my problem D I took a xBench test to see how my MBP would fair. The results here demonstrate that the electrochemical reaction tuned by the cathode architecture is a powerful tool to improve Li-O2. Note: Although there weren't any/many intel specific optimizations performed, the intel part was compiled w/ gcc 4 while the ppc w/ 3.3? Sounds like it should be fair. Computer-Assisted Translation: SDL Trados 2021, memoQ 9.8, Memsource, Passolo 2022, SDL MultiTerm 2021, ApSIC Xbench, OmegaT, MateCat and SmartCat machine translation and post editing (ISO 18587. The step forward is just that we can get a test result from an intel based mac. So, I think a markdown for the benchmark is required. Do you round each task up, round down, leave it alone? A lot of the old reviews can't get the hardware to do this sort of test again. For third party sites that did reviews based on the previous baseline set it becomes a task. We see a broader range of results with the newer Core 2 MacBook. The highest score, achieved with a pair of 1 GB modules, was an imperceptible 1.6 better than the lowest score, which came from mixing a 256 MB module and a 1 GB one.
This is find for the Xbench site (simple recalculation) and for the application except smaller numbers mean slightly lower levels of precision. Regardless of the configuration, XBench results for the original MacBook were within 1 of the base 512 MB score. Now everything must be recalculated and adjusted. Most of the benchmarks on current machines that exist on the web and many older ones use the older standard. While I am glad that more developers are releasing UB applications, I think this may represent a 1 step to the side two steps back approach for Xbench, merely because of the change in the baseline machine.Ī Baseline was established and existed for months prior to this. Testresults Xbench 1.2 We have compared the new G5 DualCore 2.0GHz and 2.3GHz with a old watercooled G5 dual 2.5GHz. The current version is released as a universal binary and is only 52k larger than its 644k predecessor.
Xbench results for mac os#
Xbench is a highly popular 'benchmarking' suite for Mac OS X.
0 kommentar(er)
